Free calculator

Freight and shipping carbon calculator (road, sea, air, rail)

Convert shipment tonnes and kilometres into kgCO2e across road, sea, air and rail — and see the 50x gap that makes mode shift your biggest lever.

Prefer to skip the typing? Upload the bill instead — the numbers get read for you, three documents a day free.

How this calculation works

Freight emissions follow one formula, applied once per transport mode:

Emissions (kgCO₂e) = tonne-kilometres × mode emission factor (kgCO₂e/tonne-km)

A tonne-kilometre (tonne-km) is the freight industry's unit of work: one tonne of goods moved one kilometre. To compute it, multiply shipment weight in tonnes by distance in kilometres. A 2-tonne pallet consignment trucked 500 km is 2 × 500 = 1,000 tonne-km. An 18-tonne container shipped 8,000 km by sea is 144,000 tonne-km. If you know the weight and the distance — both of which sit on your freight invoice or air waybill — you know the tonne-km. No fuel data from the carrier is required.

That matters because, for most organizations, freight is moved by someone else. Under the GHG Protocol, transport you pay a third party to perform sits in Scope 3, category 4 — upstream transportation and distribution, and the tonne-km approach (the Protocol calls it the distance-based method) is the standard way to estimate it when you don't have carrier-specific fuel data. Trucks you own and fuel yourself are a different animal: those litres are Scope 1 and belong in the fleet fuel calculator instead.

Enter your tonne-km per mode above — monthly or annual, as long as you're consistent — and the calculator applies the matching factor to each mode, then sums them.

The factors — and the 50× gap

This calculator uses the UK Government's 2025 greenhouse gas conversion factors (DEFRA/DESNZ) for freighting goods, published under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and widely used internationally as default freight factors where no local set exists:

| Mode | Factor (kgCO₂e/tonne-km) | | --- | --- | | Sea freight | 0.0116 | | Rail freight | 0.0281 | | Road freight | 0.1153 | | Air freight | 0.6022 |

Read the table bottom-up and the story tells itself. Moving one tonne of cargo one kilometre by air emits 0.6022 kgCO₂e — more than fifty times the 0.0116 of sea freight. Road sits in the middle at 0.1153, and rail is roughly four times cleaner than road at 0.0281. No packaging change, efficiency programme, or carrier negotiation moves a freight footprint the way changing the mode does. The exact factor, source year, and licence used for your calculation are printed under the result, so the provenance travels with the number.

A worked example

Say you ship 2 tonnes of components 10,000 km from an overseas supplier to your warehouse. That is 20,000 tonne-km either way — the mode decides everything else.

By sea:

20,000 tonne-km × 0.0116 kgCO₂e/tonne-km = 232 kgCO₂e ≈ 0.23 tCO₂e

By air:

20,000 tonne-km × 0.6022 kgCO₂e/tonne-km = 12,044 kgCO₂e ≈ 12.0 tCO₂e

Same cargo, same distance, and the air option carries an extra ~11.8 tCO₂e — more than a 20-person office typically emits from a full year of electricity. Meanwhile the trucking legs at each end barely register: 2 tonnes × 60 km from port to warehouse is 120 tonne-km × 0.1153 = about 14 kgCO₂e, a rounding error next to the air-versus-sea decision.

This is why mode shift is the biggest lever in category 4. Reserving air for genuinely urgent goods and moving everything else by sea can cut a freight footprint by an order of magnitude; shifting long-haul road legs to rail cuts those legs by roughly three-quarters. Consolidating shipments so fewer of them fly, and forecasting demand earlier so fewer orders become "urgent" in the first place, both pull in the same direction — and both show up immediately when you recalculate the tonne-km split.

A second worked example: restocking under time pressure

A small fashion importer typically brings in stock by sea — 6 tonnes a quarter over 9,000 km from a regional supplier, or 54,000 tonne-km. Sea freight for that volume comes to 54,000 × 0.0116 = 626.4 kgCO₂e for the quarter, a modest number for the size of the business.

Then a bestselling line sells out mid-season and the importer air-freights a 200 kg restock over the same 9,000 km to catch the remaining weeks of demand: 0.2 tonnes × 9,000 km = 1,800 tonne-km, and 1,800 × 0.6022 = 1,083.96 kgCO₂e — more than the entire quarter's planned sea freight, from a shipment weighing barely 3% as much. This is the pattern that shows up repeatedly in apparel and other seasonal-demand categories: unplanned air restocks, individually small in volume, can dominate a freight footprint precisely because they are reactive rather than forecast, and forecasting accuracy is therefore a decarbonisation lever as much as a commercial one.

Common mistakes with freight accounting

  • Using volumetric (dimensional) weight instead of actual weight. Courier invoices often bill by whichever is larger — the actual kilos or a size-based volumetric figure — but tonne-km emissions track real mass. Pulling the billed weight straight off a courier invoice can overstate a bulky, lightweight shipment's footprint by a wide margin.

  • Measuring straight-line distance instead of the routed distance. A map's straight line between two ports understates real shipping lanes, which follow coastlines and shipping corridors rather than great-circle routes — the gap is usually a modest understatement, but it compounds across many shipments if applied as a habit rather than corrected.

  • Mixing owned-fleet legs into the tonne-km method. If part of a journey — say, the final delivery leg — uses a van your organization owns and fuels, that leg's litres belong in the fleet fuel calculator as Scope 1, not as additional tonne-km here. Running the whole multi-leg journey through the distance-based method double-counts or mis-scopes the owned portion.

  • Letting one urgent air shipment hide in an annual total. Because air freight's factor is roughly fifty times sea's, a single expedited shipment can dominate a period's freight number without anyone noticing, since it is easy to log tonnage without separating routine sea freight from occasional air exceptions. Tracking tonne-km by mode, not just as one combined figure, is what surfaces this.

What this calculator doesn't cover

Honesty about limitations is part of the method:

  • These are average factors, not your carrier's. Real emissions depend on the specific vessel, aircraft or vehicle, how full it ran, and the fuel it burned. If your carrier provides shipment-level emissions from its own reporting, that figure is more specific than these defaults — use it, and keep the evidence trail.
  • Well-to-tank emissions are excluded. The factors cover the transport activity itself; the upstream emissions of producing and delivering the fuel are published separately by DEFRA and are not added here. Companies reporting Scope 3 at full depth include them.
  • Distance is yours to estimate. Sea routes are longer than the straight line on a map. Use port-to-port shipping distances for sea, airport-pair distances for air, and actual road routes for trucking — then state your method and apply it consistently year to year.
  • Parcels and couriers are approximated. The tonne-km method still works for small consignments (a 30 kg parcel is 0.03 tonnes), but courier networks involve multiple legs and sorting hubs that mode-level averages only roughly capture.
  • Your own vehicles don't belong here. Fuel you buy for trucks you operate is Scope 1 — calculate those litres in the fleet fuel calculator instead of estimating them by distance.

Where this fits in your reporting

Third-party freight sits in Scope 3, category 4 — upstream transportation and distribution — under the GHG Protocol. It's the same number ISSB IFRS S2, GRI 305-3, and CDP freight questions ask for, calculated the same way whether the shipper is a manufacturer, an importer, a nonprofit distributing supplies, or a public agency's logistics arm. For anyone moving physical goods, category 4 is routinely one of the largest Scope 3 lines — and it is the one a Singapore-listed customer's questionnaire will ask about in exactly these terms: upstream transportation and distribution, tonne-km by mode.

Those questionnaires travel down supply chains fast, listing or no listing. The cheapest habit is to log tonnes, kilometres, and mode per shipment as the invoices arrive — every figure you need is already printed on them. And when you would rather not type the numbers in at all, upload the freight invoice itself: the same factors are applied to figures read straight off the document, with a confidence score on every extracted field.

Sources

Frequently asked questions

What is a tonne-km and how do I work it out?
Multiply the shipment weight in tonnes by the distance in kilometres. A 2-tonne pallet moved 500 km is 1,000 tonne-km; a 30 kg parcel flown 3,000 km is 0.03 x 3,000 = 90 tonne-km. Add up the tonne-km for all shipments in each mode, then enter the totals.
Why is air freight so much worse than sea freight?
The DEFRA 2025 factors are 0.6022 kgCO2e per tonne-km for air versus 0.0116 for sea — more than fifty times higher. Aircraft burn far more fuel per tonne carried than ships, so sending urgent-only goods by air and everything else by sea is the single biggest freight decarbonisation lever.
Is freight Scope 1 or Scope 3?
If a third-party carrier moves the goods and you pay for the freight, it is Scope 3 category 4 — upstream transportation and distribution. If you own and fuel the vehicles yourself, that fuel is Scope 1 and should be calculated from litres, not tonne-km.
Which emission factors does this calculator use?
The UK Government's 2025 greenhouse gas conversion factors (DEFRA/DESNZ) for freighting goods, published under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and widely used as international defaults where no local factor set exists. The factor, source and licence are shown under every result.
What distance should I use for sea or air shipments?
Use the actual routed distance where you can: port-to-port shipping distances for sea, airport-pair distances for air, and road-route distances for trucking. Straight-line map distances understate sea routes, so state your method and apply it consistently year to year.
Should I use the actual (gross) weight or the volumetric weight couriers bill me for?
Use actual weight for this calculator — tonne-km is a physical-mass method, and the emissions from moving cargo track its real mass, not the dimensional weight a courier uses to price a bulky-but-light parcel. Volumetric weight is a billing convention; if you only have a courier invoice showing volumetric kg, ask for the actual weight from the shipment or packing list instead.
Does a return or empty leg count as extra tonne-km?
Only if you paid for or caused that leg. A container ship or truck returning empty after a delivery does burn fuel, but under the distance-based method that leg is normally allocated to whoever books the next cargo it carries, not retrospectively to you. Where a route is dedicated and genuinely empty on the return (a chartered truck run, for instance), a more complete accounting would include it — flag that as a methodology choice rather than silently ignoring or silently adding it.
How do I handle a multi-leg shipment, like sea freight to a port then a truck to my warehouse?
Calculate each leg separately with its own mode and distance, then add the tonne-km subtotals together — the same shipment can and usually does touch two or three rows of this calculator. A container arriving by sea and finishing its journey by road is not one figure; it's a sea tonne-km number plus a much smaller road tonne-km number for the final leg.